Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:16:57 +0200 From: "Devon H. O'Dell " <dodell@offmyserver.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: 5-STABLE kernel build with icc broken Message-ID: <20050329131657.GI79414@smp500.sitetronics.com> In-Reply-To: <20050329131253.GA29144@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <423C15C5.6040902@fsn.hu> <20050327133059.3d68a78c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20050327134044.GM78512@silverwraith.com> <20050327162839.2fafa6aa@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <5bbfe7d405032823144fc1af7b@mail.gmail.com> <5bbfe7d405032823232103d537@mail.gmail.com> <20050329111107.GD69824@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050329131253.GA29144@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:12:53PM +0100, David Malone wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 09:11:07PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > That's almost a year ago and specifically for the amd64. Does anyone > > know what the results were? > > I had a quick dig around on cvsweb this morning: > > http://grappa.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/i386/i386/bcopy.s?cvsroot=dragonfly > > > I dunno if Matt has benchmarks for before and after. > > David. I believe it was asserted on the list that the modification doubled the performance. I have not tested this. --Devon [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCSVVJSkf3jVXOdl0RAqqFAJ0XUJklEODt26HckEQXI7MblhBSmgCfVTRl rU2T1lTvu6CJUUEEpA39qZ0= =7YtI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050329131657.GI79414>