Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:05:00 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        attila! <attila@hun.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: very high CPU time demand from process #10 ('idle')
Message-ID:  <20001010110500.A87663@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <20001008075120.693D71C2AB@hun.org>; from attila@hun.org on Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 07:51:20AM %2B0000
References:  <20001008075120.693D71C2AB@hun.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday,  8 October 2000 at  7:51:20 +0000, attila! wrote:
>   -- ps -ax --
>
>     0  ??  DLs    0:00.40  (swapper)
>     1  ??  ILs    0:00.07  /sbin/init --
>     2  ??  DL     0:04.23  (pagedaemon)
>     3  ??  DL     0:00.65  (vmdaemon)
>     4  ??  DL     0:00.70  (bufdaemon)
>     5  ??  DL     0:44.85  (syncer)
>    10  ??  RL  4986:29.70  (idle)
>    11  ??  WL     5:43.86  (softinterrupt)
>    12  ??  DL    24:58.44  (random)
>    13  ??  WL     0:05.88  (irq10: ahc0)
>    14  ??  WL     0:00.00  (irq11: dc0)
>    15  ??  WL     0:14.91  (irq1: atkbd0)
>    16  ??  WL     0:46.60  (irq12: psm0)
>    17  ??  WL     0:00.00  (irq6: fdc0)
>    18  ??  WL     0:00.08  (irq7: ppc0)
>    19  ??  WL     3:19.82  (irq0: clk)
>    20  ??  RL     5:43.47  (irq8: rtc)
>
>   What is process 10?

It's the idle process.

>   Is this literally a representation of the CPU idle time
>   accumulation for the 85 hours since boot?

Yes.

>   Despite the enormous time burn on 'idle' it does not show on
>   'top'.

Yes, that didn't seem to make sense.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001010110500.A87663>