Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:10:15 -0600 From: "Victor R. Cardona" <vcardona@home.com> To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: software development tools - microsoft and unix Message-ID: <20010202171015.A2926@home.com> In-Reply-To: <20010202134033.A91283@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:40:33PM %2B0000 References: <20010201183650.C76922@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200102012239.PAA17765@usr08.primenet.com> <20010202134033.A91283@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:40:33PM +0000, j mckitrick wrote: > | A secondary problem with Windows, which is _not_ common to all > | versions (which is why many shops choose to develope on NT), is > | that it is really not a true protected mode OS. Because of this, > > Now that win2k is becoming established, and appears to be quite robust, what > does this mean for the future of professional programming? It certainly > makes the environment much more attractive to programmers who need that kind > of stability. I've heard the TCP/IP performance is vastly improved as well. Yeah, the network performance is improved. That is if you call dropping network connections improvement. -- Victor R. Cardona GnuPG Key fingerprint = 62B1 7995 A830 432C 74E8 1337 EDDB E682 3C76 7404 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010202171015.A2926>