Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 12:01:26 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, jbryant@unix.tfs.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merging win95 and nt filesystem changes into msdosfs Message-ID: <199802102001.MAA02411@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Feb 1998 13:20:58 %2B0300." <199802101020.NAA02985@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > > I should also point out that there is another diff, msdosfs-vfat.diff, in > > > incoming. This diff is for 2.2. It is original and independent work of > > > Luoqi Chen. It is not supposed to support FAT32. May be, now Luoqi did some > > > further development of his work. > > > > I think that this is where things hit a logjam last time; there are two > > sets of incompatible patches to achieve two desirable things. > > *Two* desirable things? That is, VFAT for 2.2 and VFAT for -current? Or what > do you mean? My understanding was that one set of patches provided long filename support, and the other gave fat32 support. What we want is *both* of these. If I am misremembering things, please accept my apologies. Under no circumstances did I mean to imply that your work was unwanted. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802102001.MAA02411>