Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:53:52 +0200
From:      Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
To:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: nullfs & current UPDATE!
Message-ID:  <19971022235352.22444@keltia.freenix.fr>
In-Reply-To: <199710220203.TAA09608@usr03.primenet.com>; from Terry Lambert on Wed, Oct 22, 1997 at 02:03:10AM %2B0000
References:  <19971021203807.51847@keltia.freenix.fr> <199710220203.TAA09608@usr03.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Terry Lambert:
> Probably the "correct" way to handle this is to avoid aliases, and
> instead establish a null_getpage/null_putpage VOP for page access,
> and force it to make the reference to the underlying FS.

Something I don't understand is why the vnode layer should be aware of
things like pages ? We're talking about files, vnodes and such, not pages.
 
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: There are no limits -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #41: Sat Oct 18 18:47:01 CEST 1997



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971022235352.22444>