Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:48:42 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> To: Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: a sysctl for process binary osreldate Message-ID: <20120317224842.GA43874@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <86d38asyb5.fsf@kopusha.home.net> References: <8662e3m3eq.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120317203702.GA42572@DataIX.net> <86haxnrl6b.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20120317212653.GS75778@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86d38asyb5.fsf@kopusha.home.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:38:22PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:26:53 +0200 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > KB> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:07:24PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:37:02 -0400 Jason Hellenthal wrote: > >> > >> JH> Would this be a planned MFC to stable/N as well specifcially 8 ? > >> > >> I plan to MFC to stable/9 if there is no objections. > > KB> I do not see why the merge to stable/8 cannot be done from the technical > KB> POV. If Mikolaj has no time or desire to merge to 8, I can help him. > > If people consider this to be useful, no problem for me to merge to 8. > I for one would. It would be nice to see this information on running procs to verify there is not some old running binary that was left behind in an upgrade. -- ;s =;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120317224842.GA43874>