Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 07:25:02 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com> Cc: "current@freebsd.org Current" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 'silent' kernel builds ? Message-ID: <20131215062502.GA99699@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <210A5B78-8220-499D-930E-F042A3DD4360@felyko.com> References: <20131215054529.GB99455@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <210A5B78-8220-499D-930E-F042A3DD4360@felyko.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:53:30PM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote: > On 14 Dec 2013, at 21:45, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I was trying to make buildkernel a bit quieter (just listing > > the name of the file being compiled). > > > > I hoped to modify the " .c.o: " rules in share/sys.mk but apparently > > kernel builds generate their own Makefile using definitions in > > sys/conf/kern.pre.mk . > > > > As a result, a patch like the one below gets most of the work done > > (a few extra bits are necessary to mask the awk calls, and the > > 'irregular' compiler invocations). > > > > However I could not found the rule definition used to build modules, > > any idea where to look ? > > sys/conf/kmod.mk ... ok, which in turn ends up into share/sys.mk at least for the .c.o rule > > And finally, is there interest in this feature ? > > I think it would be nice to have, maybe enabled by default. Does it still print the errors? I think so, but I'm not sure. Yes it does print errors, just checked. I am not worried about making it a default, POLA probably suggests otherwise and it is simple to control it through a make.conf or environment variable. thanks luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131215062502.GA99699>