Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:52:33 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> To: Adam Kirchhoff <adam.k.kirchhoff@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: radeon and xorg 7.7 Message-ID: <5043D521.4020105@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CANzk6u2gCA7AbmaOg62YxqrRwE3yRcxjuxAR3MVZg0TdK_tQHA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANzk6u2Z9v5hdETWYFvke7tYRCqUANKpgjkWfVSUd%2BTMgdHJdg@mail.gmail.com> <CANzk6u2FdzGJ5RKZtiH-Yjy4SvK9jaYB7viAewLERwk8XKSaeA@mail.gmail.com> <CANzk6u2gCA7AbmaOg62YxqrRwE3yRcxjuxAR3MVZg0TdK_tQHA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/01/12 01:57, Adam Kirchhoff wrote: > So no one knows what's going on here? What's the timetable for pushing > this into the ports tree, because I truly hope someone fixes this before > then :-) > > Adam > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Adam Kirchhoff > <adam.k.kirchhoff@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> The backtrace for the 'nv' driver is different, seemingly having nothing >> to do with libpciaccess. >> >> Should I open a pr for this problem? I'm hesitant to do so as this is not >> yet in the ports tree, and the CFT asked for feedback here. >> >> Just to clarify, this was built using the updated Xorg ports here: >> https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/ports/trunk >> >> The system is 9.1-RC1, amd64, though I have also tested on -CURRENT and >> -STABLE this weekend. >> >> I have attempted to just drop back to libpciaccess-0.12.1, but that >> doesn't seem to be enough. I have not yet tried to build X server 1.12.3 >> against the older libpciaccess (nor am I likely to get to that any time >> soon). >> >> Adam I take it this problem is with the libpciaccess that is in the development repository, not the regular ports tree. If so, the problem is known and being worked on. It will not be merged to the regular ports tree before this is resolved. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5043D521.4020105>