Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 22:21:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] libpthread support Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308082219340.7659-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030809003630.GA3293@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:31:12PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:38:30PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > I've got some preliminary patches to add alpha support to libpthread: > > > > > > I'll boot-up my alpha and play with it a bit... > > Ok, things compile and the patches look reasonable. In signalcontext() > we probably want to remove the sp -= 16 statement. On ia64 this is > required because each function has 16 bytes of scratch space on the > stack (per the runtime specification). We don't need it on alpha. OK. > Other than that I suggest we commit it, hook-up libkse to the build > and cross bridges when we come to them (ie we tweak and/or fix when > we can actually test the code). Thoughts? Sure, I'll try to commit it tomorrow. Feel free to beat me to it if you want. There were a few places in enter_uts.S and context.S where I used ldil and ldl instructions. Those should be ldiq and ldq's, right? -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10308082219340.7659-100000>