Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 12:21:42 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/19482: Upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to 4.0-STABLE causes RIP packets to be dropped Message-ID: <20000711122142.I83055@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <79658.963310593@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>; from sheldonh@uunet.co.za on Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 12:16:33PM %2B0200 References: <20000711121502.H83055@lucifer.bart.nl> <79658.963310593@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000711 12:20], Sheldon Hearn (sheldonh@uunet.co.za) wrote: >On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 12:15:02 +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > >> So what is your point exactly? > >My point is that "mis-filed" is an accurate description, while "botched" >has negative connotations which we should avoid, particularly in cases >where the entire PR is not a write-off. Apparantly you have negative feeling when I use botched. I don't associate it with anything negative nor have I received complaints about the usage of botched in the responses. Sorry, but I am going to describe the stuff I do with the correct words in my opinion. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl ``...by God I *KNOW* what this network is for, and you can't have it.'' -- Russ Albery To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000711122142.I83055>