Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 04:26:43 -0800 (PST) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) To: torstenb@pegasus.tlk.com Cc: torstenb@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/imaze Makefile ports/games/imaze/patches patch-ab patch-aa Message-ID: <199611201226.EAA02157@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <m0vPqjL-000mBEC@pegasus.tlk.com> (torstenb@pegasus.tlk.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > (1) Checking MOTIFLIB here is meaningless, many users won't have it * > defined even if they have Motif. (HAVE_MOTIF will define MOTIFLIB * > it in bsd.port.mk, which is included after this line.) * * ok, optional now. You misunderstood me. I said CHECKING it here is meaningless, because it's typically undefined for both Motif users and non-Motif users. You added a definition of this, which is totally bogus. * > (2) We don't want to ship static Motif libraries if the port can be * > compiled with other toolkits. * > * > * > >From the above two, I think it's better if you check if * > defined(HAVE_MOTIF) and !defined(MOTIF_STATIC). * * Hm, we don't have to link imaze with motif. It works with xview and that's * still the default. It's ok to build it with Motif if the user has shared libXm and intends to use it with only shared libXm. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611201226.EAA02157>