Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:26:11 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?unknown-8bit?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/rc.d early.sh Message-ID: <20071010162611.GA12085@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <86hckzgthr.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <200710090730.l997UEEF042804@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071010002930.GA91077@dragon.NUXI.org> <86hckzgthr.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +0000, Doug Barton wrote: > > > Modified files: > > > etc/rc.d early.sh > > > Log: > > > Deprecate use of the early.sh script as advertised when the support for > > > local rc.d scripts in the overall boot order was added. > > ". /etc/rc.early" in /etc/rc will stay? Correct? > > There is no ". /etc/rc.early" in /etc/rc; /etc/rc.early is run by > /etc/rc.d/early.sh. Oh my, you're right. It was a localism I added back from when it was removed in rc rev. 1.329. > I must confess I don't really see the point of this change. Yes, > people can write rc.d scripts instead, but not (by far) as easily as > they can add a line or two to rc.early. Agreed - thats why I manually put it back in /etc/rc. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071010162611.GA12085>