Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:19:47 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: new TCL vs. current-6 Message-ID: <20041208171947.GA46271@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200412081205.39354.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200412081205.39354.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:05:38PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Three of my TCL-based ports fail now on amd64 running current-6. All fail= ures=20 > occur, when an attempt is made to use the TCL-interpreter -- either to ru= n=20 > the port's self-tests, or to generate the manual pages. The failures are= =20 > either "Floating point exceptions" or "Segmentation faults" and appear to= =20 > only happen on amd64 (may be, on ia64 as well): >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/mi%40aldan.algebra.com.html >=20 > Can anyone confirm being able to use freshly built TCL on amd64 _at all_? >=20 > My ports did not change in months -- what could be wrong with TCL and/or= =20 > amd64? Peter speculated a problem when the world is built with -O2 (with or without -fno-strict-aliasing). I haven't been able to confirm this by testing with a world built with -O, because I only have one working amd64 package builder. Kris --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBtzezWry0BWjoQKURAgNWAKDkKLJ2A8O/20nlScYHDdvpqvMr1gCdH0fe Mg8vbrXTRD0BWCrspYw/6cY= =uNBu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041208171947.GA46271>