Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 03:13:27 -0500 From: Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@ftf.net>, Alex Perel <veers@disturbed.net>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cheesy benchmarks Message-ID: <19990707031327.A37489@holly.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <000101bec84f$6db395d0$021d85d1@youwant.to>; from David Schwartz on Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 01:05:08AM -0700 References: <19990707101034.41857@ns.int.ftf.net> <000101bec84f$6db395d0$021d85d1@youwant.to>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 7, 1999, David Schwartz wrote: > > It's just not a benchmark. > > What it shows is that Linux and FreeBSD are roughly comparable in their > ability to serve simple web pages and CGIs, at least with loopback > networking and in their approximately default configurations. It further > shows that some methods of generating web pages seem much faster than > others. But what real good is that other than to get publicity that you did a benchmark? I'm sure I can get better performance through lo0 than I would through tun0, but what's the point? -- Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> I am still waiting for the advent of the computer science groupie. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990707031327.A37489>