Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:51:30 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EHCI considered harmful? Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.0.20041029114847.0aa57728@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <200410291511.24063.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org> <200410291511.24063.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:11 AM 29/10/2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>Well, if we would take stability and general usefulness (even more so in
>comparison to other USB implementations in mind) as the reference point, we
>would need to disable most of USB. I think enabling ehci in GENERIC would be
>a good idea, especially since there's no loadable module...
On my Intel 865 box, its pretty easy for me to lock the system up with 2
different types of USB key drives (Lexar and SANDISK). The system also
sporadically locks up at boot time, if I have a Keyspan USB-Serial device
plugged in using EHCI. For new users, I think its more important that the
system works. If one wants to experiment with USB2, its not that hard to
compile a custom kernel.
---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.2.0.0.20041029114847.0aa57728>