Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:48:36 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/comms/gnokii Makefile ports/databases/clip Makefile ports/editors/openoffice-1.0 Makefile ports/editors/openoffice-1.1 Makefile ports/editors/vim Makefile ports/irc/irssi Makefile ports/korean/gdick Makefile ports/misc/mc ... Message-ID: <20040213184835.GB67645@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <1076657225.19917.54.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200402040525.i145PMxO019945@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040213071753.GA29422@dragon.nuxi.com> <1076657225.19917.54.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 02:27:05AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > Can you check that this change is proper? I don't follow GNOME at all,
> > but it seems Vim is now always {WANT,USE}_GNOME -- which is wrong. One
> > can specify to build Vim various ways. From w/o X11 support, to with
> > just Athena widgets, all the way to GNOME-ME-HARDER.
>
> The change doesn't affect any of the other various modes. For example,
> on a clean system:
...
> I tested -DWITH_GNOME, too, but I think you get the idea. Setting
> WANT_GNOME just instructs bsd.gnome.mk to build a list of available
> GNOME components. It does not mean that GNOME has to be used. Does
> that address your concern?
Thanks for looking at this. Sounds OK. I'm quite clues WRT GNOME so I
didn't know what {WANT,USE}_GNOME really means. (still don't, but that's
OK)
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040213184835.GB67645>