Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:03:28 +0100 From: KILOREUX Emperex <kiloreux@gmail.com> To: soc-status@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Implementing API to link sysctl nodes to devices. Message-ID: <CAN1JrQ3OpRs0hh51rXZpUnd24_g_EArraiodehU075hxmZYaOQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN1JrQ0rMn478HEkHW7AnBUUXzYf8CRafF0=kSLJZ_7VFZh=4Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAN1JrQ0rMn478HEkHW7AnBUUXzYf8CRafF0=kSLJZ_7VFZh=4Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Status update: We have decided to make calls from specific drivers to the generic query_device using an IOCTL code that is named QUERY_DEVICE_IOCTL, plans for this week and the next to finish the API and to link it for DRM. On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 7:13 AM, KILOREUX Emperex <kiloreux@gmail.com> wrote: > Status update for this week: > > After a deep discussion about the design for the new API (which took a > little bit longer than planned), and for me to investigate the community > feedback (Discussion here : > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2016-June/017817.html) , > I have started the implementation of the API inside the kernel, I am a bit > late behind schedule due to unpredicted circumstances, but will be working > 18 hours a days for the next week to catch up, I started the implementation > of the API inside the kernel yesterday, so breking it down: > * Initial API design: done > * Implementation : Working on it >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN1JrQ3OpRs0hh51rXZpUnd24_g_EArraiodehU075hxmZYaOQ>