Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:05:42 -0500 From: "Zimmerman, Eric" <Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com> Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: portinstall .vs. make install clean Message-ID: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E017E8F6F@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 6/27/05, Dominic Marks <dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> wrote: > > On Sunday 26 June 2005 19:32, Sergey Spivak wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > portinstall is a ruby program which comes with portupgrade > > > > > > "portinstall" =3D "portupgrade -N" > > > > Oh. Makes me wonder why 'portinstall' exists at all. While this isn't related to the OP's question, it might be helpful to him. I find portmanager to be vastly superior to portupgrade. In one fell swoop you can update any new ports + rebuild all dependencies.=20 It works well. Combine it with portsnap and life is good! =3D) It doesn't have a ruby dependency either. Give it a whirl. It rocks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E017E8F6F>