Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 23:18:37 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: cjclark@home.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The procfs Hole in 2.2.8-STABLE? Message-ID: <200005220518.XAA67456@billy-club.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 May 2000 22:58:57 MDT." <4.3.1.2.20000521225733.048a0c40@localhost> References: <4.3.1.2.20000521225733.048a0c40@localhost> <Your message of "Sun, 21 May 2000 14:08:47 EDT." <20000521140847.G96573@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> <20000521140847.G96573@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <4.3.1.2.20000521225733.048a0c40@localhost> Brett Glass writes: : Hopefully, some of the things that are being fixed in 4.0 will : be backported to 3.5. We want 3.5 to be the "golden" release that : we use for production until 4.2 is ready and stable. 4.1 should be golden enough for production in even the most demanding environments. That said, as far as I know people have been good and backported all relevant security fixes made to 4.0 back to the 3.x branch. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005220518.XAA67456>