Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 21:28:49 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Jacob S <stormspotter@6Texans.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with HT support in 5.4 Message-ID: <k8if91l97645ftmllfs8ittdvablmk8is3@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <20050527093046.748e33c1@jacob.6texans.net> References: <20050527085445.38de5553@jacob.6texans.net> <b7052e1e05052707056d4faa4@mail.gmail.com> <20050527093046.748e33c1@jacob.6texans.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:30:46 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >>=20 >> Oh, wait, it is probably just the last HT security patch, >> = ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.as= c. > >hmm... So basically, SMP can be enabled, but it won't use HT even if it >sees a capable processor?=20 Unless you use the ULE scheduler (which is broken and buggy on RELENG_5) there is no benefit to using HT. In fact, it will make some things worse. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?k8if91l97645ftmllfs8ittdvablmk8is3>