Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:05:54 -0800 From: "Dave Walton" <walton@onlinemusic.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Subject: Re: suiddir and samba Message-ID: <3A7032C2.26253.6730CE@localhost> In-Reply-To: <3A707655.47313E21@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Jan 2001, at 10:54, Julian Elischer wrote: > Doug White wrote: > > > > I suppose if you *really*really* want the owner to propagate, then use > > suiddir. Of course, unless you hack Samba the suid bit won't get set on > > subdirectories. > > SUIDIR propogates it.. Ah, that's the thing that started this thread. SUIDDIR is *not* propogating the suid bit on directories created via Samba. Isn't that supposed to happen automagically at the fs level when the dir is created? Dave ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Walton Chief Technology Officer OnlineMusic.com walton@onlinemusic.com http://www.onlinemusic.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A7032C2.26253.6730CE>