Date: 08 Apr 2005 10:51:52 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Common Lisp on FreeBSD Message-ID: <441x9l8gon.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <20050408133347.GB1809@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20050408133347.GB1809@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> writes: > I noticed that the clisp port is marked broken, so I have to look at other > choices. > > Does anyone have any thoughts on the other Lisp ports as a good system to > learn on and use? Depends on what you're doing. Other than clisp, the Common Lisp implementations in ports are pretty much all derived from the same origin (the CMU implementation), so you might as well just try them and see what you like; the technical differences shouldn't be that big. [That's ignoring the "embeddable" one, but I wouldn't recommend that for learning.] Or maybe you should consider Scheme... but that's another holy war. Good luck. -- What? You expected a direct answer from *me*? Silly boy.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?441x9l8gon.fsf>