Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 17:25:49 +0900 From: FUJISHIMA Satsuki <sf@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/sox Makefile ports/audio/sweep Makefile ports/audio/normalize Makefile ports/audio/mpg321 Makefile ports/audio/audacity Makefile ports/audio/terminatorx Makefile ports/audio/xmms-mad Makefile ports/audio/py-mad Makefile ... Message-ID: <86ad63emwi.wl@gray.plala.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <1070866201.84504.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200312070127.hB71R7rA089150@repoman.freebsd.org> <86ekvgdt6n.wl@gray.plala.or.jp> <1070847025.84504.19.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <86d6b0dlnj.wl@gray.plala.or.jp> <1070864318.84504.21.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <86brqjergz.wl@gray.plala.or.jp> <1070866201.84504.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Mon, 08 Dec 2003 01:50:01 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > For the most part, you don't need to. All of the ports that used libmad > by default got the bump. Not all users have mad installed, after all. > However, if you use portupgrade, the old shared libs are preserved by > default, so initially there shouldn't be a problem. Yes they will continue to work but this is not the point. I believe any port which depends on different library should have different PORTREVISION because they might work differently. Do you think the benefits of new library are not worth to mention for users of "no mad by default" ports?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ad63emwi.wl>