Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:15:28 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Subject: Re: Linux compatible setaffinity. Message-ID: <863at36v7z.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0801111550080.8359@sea.ntplx.net> (Daniel Eischen's message of "Fri\, 11 Jan 2008 15\:52\:33 -0500 \(EST\)") References: <20071219211025.T899@desktop> <18311.49715.457070.397815@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0801111550080.8359@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes: > I favor the Solaris API which allows you to specify either a process > or a thread (LWP) and a processor set. Cf Kip. Regardless of which API we choose for FreeBSD applications, we should also implement the Linux API to simplify the porting of Linux applications. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?863at36v7z.fsf>