Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:52:00 +0200
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nullfs: panic: vrele: negative ref cnt
Message-ID:  <20090309205200.GY41617@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <200903091642.25311.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <3a142e750903090615t63a594e8rbadd7f7231049180@mail.gmail.com> <200903091642.25311.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--5H4PyCrLBLHHAoJp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:42:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 09 March 2009 9:15:22 am Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> > Hi,
> > here is part of textdump:
> >=20
> > panic(c061db9e,0,c061cee6,88e,4,...) at panic+0x136
> > vrele(c4326d9c,0,c433fb5f,82,c060f3c7,...) at vrele+0x111
> > null_nodeget(c3fd4780,c4326d9c,c3ba8bf4,0,c3ba8be4,...) at null_nodeget=
+0xa0
> > null_bypass(c3ba8be0,c3f35a78,c3ba8c28) at null_bypass+0x141
> > VOP_VPTOCNP_APV(c4340240,c3ba8be0,c061bf01,387,c3cecc00,...) at
> > VOP_VPTOCNP_APV+0xb3
>=20
> Try this.  null_bypass() can't handle VOP_VPTOCNP because VPTOCNP doesn't=
=20
> return a vnode that is locked and VREF'd, but just a vnode that is vhold(=
)'d. =20
> This patch attempts to give nullfs a VOP_VPTONCP() method which remaps th=
e=20
> directory vnode properly on return by locking the directory vnode while=
=20
> invoking null_nodeget().
>=20
> --- //depot/user/jhb/lock/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c
> +++ /home/jhb/work/p4/lock/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c
> @@ -722,6 +722,34 @@
>  	return VOP_VPTOFH(lvp, ap->a_fhp);
>  }
> =20
> +static int
> +null_vptocnp(struct vop_vptocnp_args *ap)
> +{
> +	struct vnode *lvp, *dvp;
> +	int error;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We can't use null_bypass() because 'dvp' is not returned
> +	 * locked.  It is merely 'vhold()'ed.
> +	 */
> +	lvp =3D NULLVPTOLOWERVP(ap->a_vp);
> +	error =3D VOP_VPTOCNP(lvp, &dvp, ap->a_buf, ap->a_buflen);
> +	if (error)
> +		return (error);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Map 'dvp' to the corresponding null node.  We have to lock
> +	 * it before calling null_nodeget().
> +	 */
> +	vn_lock(dvp, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY);
> +	error =3D null_nodeget(ap->a_vp->v_mount, dvp, ap->a_vpp);
> +	if (error) {
> +		vrele(dvp);
> +		vdrop(dvp);
> +	}
> +	return (error);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Global vfs data structures
>   */
> @@ -743,4 +771,5 @@
>  	.vop_strategy =3D		VOP_EOPNOTSUPP,
>  	.vop_unlock =3D		null_unlock,
>  	.vop_vptofh =3D		null_vptofh,
> +	.vop_vptocnp =3D		null_vptocnp,
>  };

I do not think that nullfs-specific method is needed.
I already mailed the following patch to the reporters.

diff --git a/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c b/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c
index 5a6823f..38da43f 100644
--- a/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c
+++ b/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c
@@ -742,5 +742,6 @@ struct vop_vector null_vnodeops =3D {
 	.vop_setattr =3D		null_setattr,
 	.vop_strategy =3D		VOP_EOPNOTSUPP,
 	.vop_unlock =3D		null_unlock,
+	.vop_vptocnp =3D		vop_stdvptocnp,
 	.vop_vptofh =3D		null_vptofh,
 };

--5H4PyCrLBLHHAoJp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkm1gXAACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gZFQCg38LpMXxdRi0F8d4O8jv0TCth
D2MAoOlIGNFyJORNeidhaNV6dWb16BQT
=lbJC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5H4PyCrLBLHHAoJp--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090309205200.GY41617>