Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 May 1998 13:35:58 +0900
From:      Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org>
To:        Pierre Beyssac <pb@fasterix.freenix.org>
Cc:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>, core@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD 
Message-ID:  <28412.895120558@coconut.itojun.org>
In-Reply-To: pb's message of Thu, 14 May 1998 02:18:34 %2B0200. <19980514021834.C6349@fasterix.frmug.fr.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>The WIDE approach, from what I understand, is to provide new tools
>for a lot (not all: some are integrated too) of these. They have
>a separate inet6d for IPv6 daemons, for example. I think (but I
>can be wrong) it only exists for FreeBSD.

	WIDE IPv6 stack is for FreeBSD, BSDI and NetBSD. (NetBSD version
	is not tgz'ed for public distribution yet, but is working in-house)

	The way we compiled the kit for 2.2.6-RELEASE is aimed for "easy
	start-up".  If we mandate "make world" for everybody to play with WIDE
	stack, less people will try to play with our stack.
	We may, however, try different ways in for-3.0 release depending
	on how we can release our kit....

itojun

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28412.895120558>