Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:57:59 +0100 From: Gerhard Sittig <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw2 vs ipfilter Message-ID: <20030128005759.A4807@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030127143019.069e3380@marble.sentex.ca>; from mike@sentex.net on Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:56:37PM -0500 References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030127143019.069e3380@marble.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 15:56 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> Rule wise, I am happy with either, except I would really miss ipfw's
> concept of 'me'. e.g. ipfw add 5000 deny log tcp from any to me 2604.
You don't have to, in ipf speak the address "0.0.0.0/32" _is_ "me".
virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net
--
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030128005759.A4807>