Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:16:41 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 264065] java/openjdk8: Crashes on aarch64 when built with clang13: # Internal Error (assembler_aarch64.hpp:237) .. guarantee(val < (1U << nbits)) failed: Field too big for insn Message-ID: <bug-264065-8522-XZvJMJqM3B@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-264065-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-264065-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=264065 --- Comment #29 from Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #28) As I noted in comment #18 and comment #19, as far as *I* can see, upstream has already backported fixes to both openjdk8 and openjdk11 for both issues: * openjdk8: - markOopDesc fix for clang >= 13: https://github.com/battleblow/jdk8u/commit/303a829ecf6172b6fe0b433e5ab2fc584702facc - aarch64 "Field too big for insn" fix: https://github.com/battleblow/jdk8u/commit/638cc9a48430075bf223c25a8adb50d76d56b278 * openjdk11: - markOopDesc fix for clang >= 13: https://github.com/battleblow/jdk11u/commit/305a68a90c722aa7a7b75589e24d5b5d554c96c1 - aarch64 "Field too big for insn" fix: https://github.com/battleblow/jdk11u/commit/bdaa8a38a80dacfc10a7a9bea2ea2fbfca65803f However, in comment #20, comment #21 and comment #22, several different people note that, for some reason, openjdk8 (and maybe openjdk11) is *still* crashing for them, on aarch64. Since I do not have access to (fast) aarch64 hardware, I cannot check whether they are right are not, and therefore the safest action seemed to be reversal. That said, now that I read back through the thread, could it be that after commit 591a784f324b7d8c45596d758b4c0893626bdbef (where I removed the llvm12 workaround), I also didn't bump the port revision, and therefore people were maybe running binary packages in their poudriere instances *without* the fix? I'm unsure whether poudriere figures out something changed in a dependent port; does it always need a package version bump? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-264065-8522-XZvJMJqM3B>