Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 14:26:32 +0000 From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru> Cc: brian@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ppp & signals pending Message-ID: <199703121426.OAA18435@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:09:02 %2B0300." <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970312000423.1281A-100000@nagual.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, 11 Mar 1997, Brian Somers wrote: > > > Everything that's trapped with a call to Hangup() is fatal, but I suspect > > that HUP was causing the malloc() recursion. > > HUP must never come during normal mode because modem is not control > terminal for PPP. PPP code strangely use every second carrier check > instead of using HUP on control terminals. Good spot, so does anyone have any problems with using HUP as a re-open log file signal ? As ppp doesn't use syslog, newsyslog turns over the file with no way of getting ppp -auto to notice. > -- > Andrey A. Chernov > <ache@null.net> > http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/ > -- Brian <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>, <brian@freebsd.org> <http://www.awfulhak.demon.co.uk/>; Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703121426.OAA18435>