Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:46:47 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        karels@karels.net
Cc:        Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 6.2 mtu now limits size of incomming packet
Message-ID:  <469EDEA7.9000606@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <200707190130.l6J1UfS4027169@redrock.karels.net>
References:  <200707190130.l6J1UfS4027169@redrock.karels.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Karels wrote:
>> There are also things to consider such as if a GigE card is connected to 
>> a GigE device (switch/card etc) and the card supports jumbo frames 
>> should the MRU be set to the max jumbo receive size for the card? This 
>> could cause confusion when people plug jumbo capable devices in with 
>> hardware limitations making the MRU lower than other devices on the network.
> 
> Although we don't have an MRU explicitly, we don't enable reception
> of jumbo frames without administrator action.  There is an IFCAP_JUMBO_MTU
> flag defined, but not previously used as far as I know.  We added the
> ability to set that flag with ifconfig, which enables reception of
> jumbo frames without changing the MTU.  Then, in ether_input, we accept
> any packet that a NIC sees fit to receive.

for what values of "we"?

> 
> 		Mike
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?469EDEA7.9000606>