Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:50:52 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Indiscriminately installing all .h files in /usr/include/* Message-ID: <20030226005003.O903@znfgre.tberna.bet> In-Reply-To: <20030211073011.GA576@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <143501c2d154$9c3c70e0$52557f42@errno.com> <20030211041721.B3AEE2A8B4@canning.wemm.org> <20030211073011.GA576@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:17:21PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> >
> > Part of the reason why its done like it is right now is that nobody really
> > got around to figuring out what was needed and doing the Makefile lists
> > and testing that it didn't break stuff.
>
> Testing is really the hard part. It would be nice to have a way to
> have the whole ports collection built with a particular change before
> the change is committed. Ie, use the ports collection for regression
> testing.
Talk to kris. He fits changes to test into bento builds fairly regularly.
Doug
--
"The last time France wanted more evidence, it rolled right
through Paris with a German flag." - David Letterman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030226005003.O903>