Date: 29 May 1999 12:18:19 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FTP passive mode - a new default? Message-ID: <xzpyai8mb6c.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Ollivier Robert's message of "Fri, 28 May 1999 19:59:47 %2B0200" References: <19990526182800.EGOX7623210.mta2-rme@wocker> <xzpn1ypo0v7.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no> <19990528195947.A93018@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> writes: > According to Dag-Erling Smorgrav: > > FTP servers which do not accept passive mode are, IMHO, broken. Their > They're broken with respect to RFC-959, not only to your opinion :-) No. Allowable responses to the PASV command include 227 (Entering passive mode), 500 (Unrecognized command), 501 (Invalid parameters), 502 (Command not implemented), 421 (Service not available), and 530 (Not logged in). A server which does not wish to allow passive mode can thus choose to acknowledge the command but refuse to obey it (502), or to reject the command altogether (500). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpyai8mb6c.fsf>