Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:25:21 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disable 64-bit dma for one PCI slot only? Message-ID: <20110720122521.GJ17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4E26A5BE.4000909@freebsd.org> References: <4E20BA23.13717.66C6F57@markmcconnell.iinet.com> <201107181714.07827.jhb@freebsd.org> <4F739848-E3CE-4E2C-A91E-90F33410E7AC@samsco.org> <201107190931.36492.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAFqOu6gqYKdOv6ojpTeVX5MzgVnLibvf=XjGsC1j6w5kFnvN=w@mail.gmail.com> <4E26A5BE.4000909@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Bina0ufSB9dLMnVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:54:06AM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote: > The "Rev" column is required for of devices that are not uniquely > identified by their Vnd/Dev-IDs. (These used to exist, e.g. the Symbios > SCSI controllers, though I'm not aware of any device that needed a > different driver depending on the PCI revision number.) Might be there is indeed no such device which require different driver due to revision, but there are definitely devices that require different workarounds in the driver based on revision. Seeing the revision in the output of pciconf very much helps to reduce the mail turnaround when analyzing user reports. --Bina0ufSB9dLMnVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk4myTEACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jx7gCg6bgT+K3jWV00mGgZ0MlXCyJT VxYAniX1SsUiXD9RxgJOhOb/y7EHN+tf =AALZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bina0ufSB9dLMnVr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110720122521.GJ17489>