Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:33:18 -0500 From: Robert Fitzpatrick <robert@webtent.com> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kernel arp errors Message-ID: <1078968797.4941.1.camel@columbus> In-Reply-To: <1078934067.3686.44.camel@columbus> References: <1078934067.3686.44.camel@columbus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 10:54, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I am running 5.2.1 with two NIC's, both connected to a Cisco switch with
> a Cisco router also connected to the switch for Internet connectivity.
> There are 5 eth ports on the router, one of them with an address
> assigned of 66.129.101.193/28 and another with 66.129.101.217/29, the
> other eth ports are the ISP connection and other one other subnet. One
> port not used. On the FreeBSD host, the two NIC's are assigned with em0
> as 66.129.101.198/28 and em1 as 66.129.101.219/29. These are the
> messages I am getting over and over, note the IP's are those of the
> router:
>
> Mar 10 10:35:49 esmtp kernel: arp: 66.129.101.193 is on em0 but got
> reply from 00:30:94:32:94:30 on em1
> Mar 10 10:35:51 esmtp kernel: arp: 66.129.101.217 is on em1 but got reply from 00:30:94:32:94:32 on em0
>
> I know I can do some config on the router to isolate subnet traffic to
> ports, but haven't done this, yet. Is this my problem or can someone
> help me understand what is going on?
Replying to myself since posting the first time. I had the need to add
another IP address in the same subnet as the existing IP on em0, a
virtual IP (em0:0?). I try to add an IP to the em0 and it gives me an
error, see below, but seems to work fine on em1:
esmtp# ifconfig em1 alias 66.129.101.220 255.255.255.248
esmtp# ifconfig -a
em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM>
inet 66.129.101.198 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 66.129.101.207
inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe29:847c%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
ether 00:30:48:29:84:7c
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
em1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM>
inet 66.129.101.219 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 66.129.101.223
inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe29:847d%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
inet 66.129.101.220 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 255.255.255.248
ether 00:30:48:29:84:7d
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: no carrier
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
esmtp# ifconfig em1 alias 66.129.101.195 255.255.255.240
ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists
Afterwards, now I am getting this message in the syslog similar to the
others I originally posted:
Mar 10 19:39:24 esmtp kernel: arp: 66.129.101.198 is on lo0 but got
reply from 00:30:48:29:84:7c on em1
Can anyone help me understand what I'm doing wrong?
--
Robert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1078968797.4941.1.camel>