Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:54:30 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: idea bouncing: using cvs as a replacement for mergemaster Message-ID: <474CE676.2000709@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2072C94B-26F4-4ABA-8E09-A409006F052A@u.washington.edu> References: <474CE455.6070603@gmail.com> <2072C94B-26F4-4ABA-8E09-A409006F052A@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > > I was thinking seeing the fact that I already have a cvs repo of > -current does it make sense to just use CVS to update /etc > instead of > mergemaster... if so any ideas on doing it cleanly? > > CVS sucks and I wouldn't wish that requirement on anyone for > their base system.. > There isn't a decent idiot-proof / foolproof system out there > for defeating merging issues... > -Garrett I was talking for myself only not anyone else - -- Aryeh M. Friedman Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHTOZ2J9+1V27SttsRAj6NAJ9WGi/BakGPvcMiRLdyX90gS0hVgQCaAqrF E1x9CjYdxLf42XbF6vus1To= =2gb8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?474CE676.2000709>