Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:30:07 -0400 From: Ryan Steinmetz <zi@FreeBSD.org> To: swills@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org Cc: stas@FreeBSD.org, ruby@FreeBSD.org, wxs@FreeBSD.org, decke@FreeBSD.org, tabthorpe@FreeBSD.org Subject: RFC: Replacing graphics/ruby-rmagick with graphics/rubygem-rmagick Message-ID: <20110731023007.GA57933@fast.rit.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, I am planning on removing graphics/ruby-rmagick and replacing it with graphics/rubygem-rmagick, pending maintainer/mentor approval. They both install the same library (RMagick2.so), however, the rubygem registers with the gem framework. Without it being registered as a gem, other ruby applications which depend on the gem consider it not to be installed and complain. As a result, I believe that the best course of action is to update the dependencies in the two ports that depend on ruby-rmagick (graphics/rubygem-gruff and www/redmine) and remove graphics/ruby-rmagick, replacing it with graphics/rubygem-rmagick. I'd welcome any thoughts/feedback you may have. I do not have any attachments to being the MAINTAINER for rubygem-rmagick, so if stas@ (or anyone else) is interested in it, please let me know. Thanks! -r --=20 Ryan Steinmetz PGP: EF36 D45A 5CA9 28B1 A550 18CD A43C D111 7AD7 FAF2 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk40vi8ACgkQ0sPSsv7zbddg/ACeOPWHN41E3sdEx3GnsKZnHPtx 4rsAoOmgpkApMKAh6wljxPwEBHkCD43Y =Ghrn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110731023007.GA57933>