Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:10:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Andrew Thompson <andy@fud.org.nz> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ported NetBSD if_bridge Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0404170008410.66312-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20040417035758.GA66806@kate.fud.org.nz>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Andrew Thompson wrote: > Hi, > > > I have ported over the bridging code from NetBSD and am looking for feedback. > My main question is, 'do people want this in the tree?' > > > The benefits over the current bridge are: > * ability to manage the bridge table > * spanning tree support > * the snazzy brconfig utility > * clonable pseudo-interface (is that a benefit?) Do we need THREE bridging systems? If you need features you culd probably add them pretty easily to one or the other of the existing bridging modules..home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0404170008410.66312-100000>