Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:54:16 -0000 (GMT)
From:      Duncan Barclay <dmlb@dmlb.org>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, Michael C.Wu <keichii@peorth.iteration.net>, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Subject:   RE: GSM vs. CDMA (was: VCD (was Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata 
Message-ID:  <XFMail.010122225416.dmlb@computer.my.domain>
In-Reply-To: <20010122103136.L93049@wantadilla.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 22-Jan-01 Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 22 January 2001 at  0:46:38 +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
>> At 4:54 PM -0600 2001/1/21, Michael C . Wu wrote:
>>
>>>  I ask the same questions about why Americans not using
>>>  GSM but PCS cell phones.  (FYI, the reason for using PCS in the U.S.
>>>  was a pure political reason, none other than America wanting
>>>  to "lead" the industry. :) )
>>
>>      Qualcomm invented Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), the
>> superior digital cell phone technology that is the basis for all 3G
>> projects around the world.  CDMA is supplanting TDMA in the US,
>> because it allows you to carry more calls in the same amount of
>> frequency bandwidth than TDMA, the previous digital technology.
>>
>>      Anybody that has to replace TDMA technology with CDMA technology
>> winds up pretty much completely replacing the entire network they
>> built, which is why it's still taking time to make this conversion in
>> the US.
> 
> Hmm.  This doesn't tie in with what I've been told by people in the
> business of developing the equipment.  According to my information,
> the reason they took CDMA in the US was because it *was* easier to
> upgrade from analogue to TDMA to CDMA. 
> 
>> However, Europe made the "leap" to TDMA technology in GSM, before
>> CDMA existed -- standard AMPS/NAMPS style analog cell phone
>> technology had been stretched beyond its limits, and they had no
>> choice but to go digital.

When Europe was developing GSM back in the early 80's CDMA was not a proven
technology for cellular and it is locked up by too many patents with one
single company (PS Guess why Ericsson bought significant chunks of Qualcomm
a while back).

BTW The company I work for has jsut joined the 4G definition groups ;-).

Duncan

---
________________________________________________________________________
Duncan Barclay  | God smiles upon the little children,
dmlb@dmlb.org   | the alcoholics, and the permanently stoned.
dmlb@freebsd.org| Steven King


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.010122225416.dmlb>