Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:31:21 -0400
From:      LuMiWa via python <python@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "python@FreeBSD.org" <python@FreeBSD.org>, Wen Heping <wen@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: python38-3.8.11 is vulnerable
Message-ID:  <20210914033121.6372e3a2@dismail.de>
In-Reply-To: <97804325-5c6e-48a6-7e8d-82090734c359@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20210912091711.6141a695@dismail.de> <97804325-5c6e-48a6-7e8d-82090734c359@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:55:19 +1000
Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On 12/09/2021 11:17 pm, LuMiWa via python wrote:
> > Hi!
> >=20
> > I start using latest binary packages and my questuions if is better
> > to use ports for some port in this case for Pythong because ports
> > as I know I faster update for vulnerabilities.
> >=20
> >   pkg audit -F
> > vulnxml file up-to-date
> > python38-3.8.11 is vulnerable:
> >    Python -- multiple vulnerabilities
> >    WWW:
> >    https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/145ce848-1165-11ec-ac7e-0800278987=
5b.html
> >=20
> > Thank you.
> >=20
>=20
> All Python language ports (lang/python*) bugfix and security updates=20
> should be committed to head and then merged to quarterly as part of
> the same task as a matter of course.
>=20
> The python38 update is being tracked here:
>=20
>    https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258195
>=20
> Once committed/merged, the availability of updates packages is=20
> contingent on the package building infrastructure, which can take up
> to a few days to complete on average, if there are no other issues.
>=20
> ./koobs

Thank you very much...I am new in the binaries world :)

"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities.=E2=80=9D

Voltaire



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210914033121.6372e3a2>