Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:28:33 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <freebsd@toco-domains.de>, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@freebsd.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48 Message-ID: <20190702142827.120588a0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20190702111647.vozqzf4gnqbajvcl@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201906192240.x5JMequU017187@repo.freebsd.org> <20190628070305.eim4o3d77iyti5d5@ivaldir.net> <20190629160445.051f2426@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <CALdFvJHK0aBF6oLTFNnTiUyrmFUHCPYm3-k7S3_-FpYTHW4WSA@mail.gmail.com> <F208C261-18D8-4E5A-BABE-A9E6D8A52B5B@FreeBSD.org> <CALdFvJENynqPAkKSf5ueuG2nBMr9tckikzZOQv9caXtgcwZg4A@mail.gmail.com> <20190702102316.wv6w5u2ilfaw6vrd@atuin.in.mat.cc> <d9d37be2-8279-af6a-1283-67f25f4f8835@toco-domains.de> <20190702111647.vozqzf4gnqbajvcl@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:16:47 +0200 Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:31:35PM +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote:
>> On 02.07.19 12:23, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 22:50, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wr=
ote:
>>>>> Le 29 juin 2019 20:40:53 GMT+02:00, "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@bat.ru>=
a
>>>>> =C3=A9crit :
>>>>>> Tonight I hope to commit 4.10 port.
>>>>>
>>>>> It does not solve rhe pb, staying on the legacy libs is the solution,=
as I
>>>>> said even fedora is on the legacy
>>>>>
>>>> I've committed net/samba410.
>>>>
>>>> My view on the situation is that all the ports, which use
>>>> devel/{talloc,tevent}, databases/tdb should keep
>>>> using them, unless they are broken by using them(but that shouldn't ha=
ppen,
>>>> API still should remain
>>>> the same. The biggest difference is the drop of the dependency on Pyth=
on27,
>>>> as far as I can see.
>>>=20
>>> So, branching 2019Q2 is now a day late.
>>> When are you going to fix the issue?
>>=20
>> Mat, is this the reason the branch is late? If so: have you considered
>> branching from r504589?
>=20
> It is being considered, yes, as a last resort kind of thing. timur@ has
> had 13 days to fix the problem, I hope he is getting close to fixing it
> all.
It's probably time to introduce some sort of a soft freeze where no
major changes are allowed (unless approved by portmgr) in the last two
weeks or so of the quarter. It's not just samba, x11@ moving the mesa
ports to llvm80 on the last day of the quarter is also way too close.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190702142827.120588a0>