Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 00:48:21 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: pst@Shockwave.COM (Paul Traina) Cc: kato@eclogite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp, FreeBSD-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: DNS Security Hole Message-ID: <199505120748.AAA00443@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199505120744.AAA06220@precipice.shockwave.com> from "Paul Traina" at May 12, 95 00:44:32 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Why would we ever want this under an #ifdef? > Sounds like it should always be applied. > > From: KATO Takenori <kato@eclogite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> > Subject: DNS Security Hole > > Resolver in FreeBSD 2.0 Release and FreeBSD-current doesn't support > "SUNSECURITY" option which appears in BIND-4.9.2. So I made a patch > to support this option. Code in this patch is derived from > BIND-4.9.3-BETA17 and its fatal bug is fixed. And the correct thing to do would be to import BIND-4.9.3-BETA17, but it seems last time this came up Paul Vixie was about to go to an official release. Is there any new status on that. I would prefer not to apply this patch only to have it conflict when the cvs import of the next official release of bind occured. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505120748.AAA00443>