Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 01:23:31 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Architecture dependent source Message-ID: <199801130123.SAA11924@usr01.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199801082332.QAA10804@mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Jan 8, 98 04:32:15 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Has the directory structure for architecture dependent source been > > decided? > > > > For instance, does src/sys/i386 become src/sys/arch/i386 (like NetBSD) > > or do we just start adding src/sys/alpha because i386 sets the precedent? > > Personally, I don't see that '/sys/arch' buys us anything other than > 'Yet Another directory'. Especially when there is no goal of having > every architecture under the sun working. > > But, I have no say in the matter, that would be David's choice to make. I would personally *love* to see /sys/kern/vfs* move to /sys/vfs/vfs* and the FS code itself to /sys/vfs/fs_name/... If there is going to be a big shuffle... well... "Never to a vast thing in a half-vast way"... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801130123.SAA11924>