Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 08:14:58 +0200 From: j@jette.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Current Mailing List) Subject: Re: CVSUP and Release Question Message-ID: <19970409081458.GD60312@jette.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <3224.860437791@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Apr 7, 1997 11:29:51 -0700 References: <19970407182108.RO31161@jette.heep.sax.de> <3224.860437791@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > So, this was the intended effect. :-) > > Fine, so now you explain to all the current pre-stables that they're > really pre-stable and not quite so safe as their uname(1) output would > have them believe. :-) They believed they were running a stable system by the time 2.1-stable has been established... so what? Do you know of any major instability of 2.2-stable? I don't. (Sure, i know of a number of bugs, but no serious instability ones. The ahc bugs should be present in all branches anyway, since Justin keeps them in sync.) -- bye, J"org ...just travelling around. Don't try reaching me except by mail. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970409081458.GD60312>