Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:18:47 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas Message-ID: <CAF-QHFXD28oowrYM1%2BLv8pPf3PT34uBJNA9cZeXSy30teTeVaw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> References: <j38lj5$s9a$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAGH67wRxehY4fZPOd1hqXkBffOrSvh4ujYw6XeqVj_VsWdDsaQ@mail.gmail.com> <j3g8o3$2fq$1@dough.gmane.org> <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 August 2011 17:15, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 29/08/2011 17:46 Ivan Voras said the following: >> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>>> right? >>> >>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. >> >> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot >> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". >> >> (all this after the traditional "do-nothing" pause of 10-or so minutes >> before displaying the copyright banner). > > Not sure if hw.memtest.tests tunable has made it into 9.0-BETA1. > Setting it to zero should result in skipping the checks. If it did, to what should I set it? > You may also try to capture and share a verbose dmesg, if possible. I'll take some photos of the screen.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF-QHFXD28oowrYM1%2BLv8pPf3PT34uBJNA9cZeXSy30teTeVaw>