Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:58:25 +0200 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> To: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken re(4) Message-ID: <20080529115825.2da70cba.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: <20080528175610.0ffe4c1c.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> References: <20080527165232.2acbb00f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20080528002823.GA63696@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080528175610.0ffe4c1c.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 May 2008 17:56:10 +0200 Gerrit K=FChn <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> wrote about Re: broken re(4): GK> PY> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.20080519 GK> Somehow the two interfaces seem to interfer with each other. Can I GK> provide further information for fixing this? Meanwhile I booted the machine with the patch several times. I get either the same status as without the patch (both interfaces basically working, but with hangs and checksum errors under load) or I get one interface working fine and one not working at all. I tried turning one if off in the bios, but this didn't change the situation: The remaining one is either working with problems or not at all. Can I do anything else? Is the newer patch (from yesterday) in your directory above worth giving a try? cu Gerrit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080529115825.2da70cba.gerrit>