Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 20:32:14 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Subject: Re: namespace pollution with struct thread? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111132031210.1336-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <xzp7ksut484.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Nov 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > One other thing worth pointing out is that there is no reason for > <sys/user.h> to include <sys/proc.h>. It just needs to declare struct > proc as an opaque structure. Also, <sys/user.h> currently pulls in a > lot of other headers such as <sys/_lock.h> and <sys/_mutex.h> that are > needed only because <sys/proc.h> depends on them. In this case it doesn't even need to include user.h it still compiles and runs without including it.... > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0111132031210.1336-100000>