Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 00:51:27 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc/config freebsd-spec.h Message-ID: <20030901075127.GA7526@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030901160120.A1311@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> References: <20030901045513.GA91654@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309010100490.5115-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20030901160120.A1311@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:01:20PM +1000, John Birrell wrote: > FWIW (probably not much), I support Dan's position on this. I'd like to > see kse become the default as a true libpthread as has been assumed in > all the work that those guys have done. > > I'll go one step further and say that I don't think libthr should be in > the tree. And libc_r should be shot just as soon as kse is functional on > the tier-1 platforms. Just to be clear, I am making zero statements about the merits of our various threading libs. I am only addressing the options that [our] GCC supports and how we stay roughly in-sync with the FSF GCC sources and behavior.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030901075127.GA7526>