Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:53:37 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r204178 - head/games/fortune/fortune Message-ID: <86r5ode2z2.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20100222133112.D27327@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> (Bjoern A. Zeeb's message of "Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:52:33 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <201002212103.o1LL3FGS037889@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002221126240.80183@fledge.watson.org> <20100222133112.D27327@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> writes: > It still seems to be quite common to use return rather than exit in > main(), and while style.9 may, in the future, possibly suggest that > exit() is the prefered token, we should not start changing all and > everything to exit() and still accept return() without major > bikesheds. Nobody's talking about changing return to exit() across the board - just about documenting existing practice and encouraging it in new code. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r5ode2z2.fsf>