Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:14:44 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r356758 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts Message-ID: <CAPyFy2DDbuf2Lz5iwbw2ApYMj%2BfODXrwbJJHOWjBbOmyC%2BW36A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfpG-BDvcm1Yh%2BczDiF6JDXcTztsZDvw=oS2HZFsnvrTGA@mail.gmail.com> References: <202001150747.00F7lqiG071097@repo.freebsd.org> <CAPjTQNHa9Um%2B0S8zMD3eeop3YSdVti0o=DSv5%2BB=455wcrq3VA@mail.gmail.com> <ed0b16af-01c8-62fe-918a-3f1f9f9dcbd8@freebsd.org> <CANCZdfpOw54MQsW4aohLn3ufgEqK8beTe_EdjYktViFubPPyzg@mail.gmail.com> <aea3e071-61bd-399d-1d1f-cce4125b2480@grosbein.net> <CAPyFy2DEC=jhQdxOLjUGs9nr%2B2n733XJfWKjTKYbAY7eubRkRQ@mail.gmail.com> <6925a470-ccbe-1446-e55e-f0aa8b6e6387@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfpG-BDvcm1Yh%2BczDiF6JDXcTztsZDvw=oS2HZFsnvrTGA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 17:55, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > It's not i386 vs amd64 that's the issue. It's the total amount of RAM. ZFS > is perfectly happy with i386 installs with enough RAM. We'd catch most > sub-optimal cases if we'd offer it only for systems with > ~2-4GB. Very good point, defaulting to UFS for <4GB and ZFS for >=4GB sounds decent to me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2DDbuf2Lz5iwbw2ApYMj%2BfODXrwbJJHOWjBbOmyC%2BW36A>