Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 21:56:12 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> To: des@flood.ping.uio.no (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) Cc: doconnor@gsoft.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: latest -current doesn't execute BSDI-binary bladeenc Message-ID: <199903170256.VAA20641@kot.ne.mediaone.net> In-Reply-To: <xzp3e34luif.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> from Dag-Erling Smorgrav at "Mar 17, 1999 03:28:24 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=> > The bug is on the web site, not in the kernel. I'd consider the web-site a "spec" and the kernel -- "implementation". By this logic, the kernel needs fixing... => > David Greenman committed a patch to better support large memory => > configurations. Unfortunately, it seems this was not possible to => > achieve without breaking BSDI compatibility. => => Would it be feasable to have an option to switch between the two? = =Probably. I was just about to investigate this possibility. It should definitly be on automaticly if the memory configuration is not large, if you ask me... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903170256.VAA20641>